﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>Internet Reputation Management Blog: Recent Comments</title>
	<updated>2010-03-14T13:14:39Z</updated>
	<id>http://reputation-blog.com/comments/atom.aspx</id>
	<link href="http://reputation-blog.com/comments/atom.aspx" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link href="http://reputation-blog.com" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blogcast</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on An Important Internet Reputation Management Question:  Should I hire a lawyer?</title>
		<link href="http://reputation-blog.com/2007/11/24/an-important-internet-reputation-management-question-should-i-hire-a-lawyer.aspx#comment-683334" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:reputation-blog.com,2007-11-28:683334</id>
		<author>
			<name>Investor1</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-11-28T18:22:15Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-28T18:22:15Z</published>
		<content type="html">Very informative.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on An Important Internet Reputation Management Question:  Should I hire a lawyer?</title>
		<link href="http://reputation-blog.com/2007/11/24/an-important-internet-reputation-management-question-should-i-hire-a-lawyer.aspx#comment-679077" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:reputation-blog.com,2007-11-26:679077</id>
		<author>
			<name>Bruce Fischman</name>
			<uri>http://fhdlaw.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-11-26T17:31:08Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-26T17:31:08Z</published>
		<content type="html">While it is true that filing a lawsuit over INTERNET publications that are damaging one's personal or business reputation may get picked up on the search engines. It is necessary to do so when traditional methods of minimizing the observable relevance of the publications have not solved the problem. Often times an individual or a business may need to send the message out to the antagonists that they will no longer sit back and take it on the chin simply because generally accepted notions of the First Amendment provide an anticipated shield for defamatory speech. This anticipation by the writer, if erroneous, subjects him or the attacking business, to liability and restraints that may create economic outlay and negative public exposure that may not make their cake worth the baking.</content>
	</entry>
</feed>